Comments on: Review: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II http://www.theapblog.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/ An amateur photography blog with guides, tips, tricks and articles. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:54:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: charliestyr http://www.theapblog.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1184 charliestyr Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:25:10 +0000 http://www.theapblog.com/?p=31#comment-1184 Nice :D I think they do vary considerably, mine's fine at f/1.8 but sometimes I notice a vague softness at the edges, although I don't claim to be an expert on lenses, and I am using this on a 400D, it would be better to review it on a camera like the 5D or similar :-) Thanks for your comment, Charlie - Nice :D I think they do vary considerably, mine’s fine at f/1.8 but sometimes I notice a vague softness at the edges, although I don’t claim to be an expert on lenses, and I am using this on a 400D, it would be better to review it on a camera like the 5D or similar :-)

Thanks for your comment,

Charlie -

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.theapblog.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Anonymous Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:22:00 +0000 http://www.theapblog.com/?p=31#comment-43 lol mine's a tack at 1.8 :P lol mine’s a tack at 1.8 :P

]]> By: Charlie Styr http://www.theapblog.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Charlie Styr Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:33:00 +0000 http://www.theapblog.com/?p=31#comment-16 You're right, I think at this quality level, the Quality Control is not very good, and the copies seem to vary hugely, as mine definitely isn't sharpest at f/2.8 or f/3, so you got a good copy there!!!<br /><br />Charlie - You’re right, I think at this quality level, the Quality Control is not very good, and the copies seem to vary hugely, as mine definitely isn’t sharpest at f/2.8 or f/3, so you got a good copy there!!!

Charlie -

]]> By: JCQ http://www.theapblog.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-15 JCQ Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:15:00 +0000 http://www.theapblog.com/?p=31#comment-15 I did some tests and found that mine is sharpest at f/2.8 and f/3 (wider than I expected), so it seems they vary considerably between copies. I did some tests and found that mine is sharpest at f/2.8 and f/3 (wider than I expected), so it seems they vary considerably between copies.

]]>